Top 10 List - Trump over HRC & Obama

Preface:

It should come as no surprise that many of the younger generation think the main issues facing the election and our country revolve around some random quotes made by Donald Trump. The most impactful quote was recorded on tape over 10 years ago at a time when he was still living the life of a playboy business tycoon. It’s quite convenient that everyone forgets Bill Clinton’s acts, not words, of indiscretion and crime, some of which took place in the White House Oval Office. A psychologist would tell you that a man who makes the kinds of remarks Trump made is generally unfulfilled and has not yet accepted his destiny. For Donald Trump, his then forthcoming marriage, and subsequent bid for the presidency, would likely inspire such an acceptance. Returning to the main point the youth of today are decidedly skewed. They predominantly hold a democratic point of view due to their source of information. They rely particularly on social-media, mainly for “updates,” not for substantive or foundational knowledge. The core issue, however, revolves around biased, predetermined media alignment. No one would argue with the fact that 85% of the media not only favors Hillary Clinton, but backs her. Some make the case, as evidence emerges forward, that she is an extension of them and them of her. Actual proof of collusion has surfaced between the two. Trump, on the other hand, is a direct threat to corporate media and the special interest power structure. Until now, the extent of the collusion / corruption remained well guarded. Therefore, voters, in particular millennials, have not had exposure to the full equation or the facts.

The two categories of media bias:

A. Current Event Issues Includes: the current administration’s policy failures, affairs of state, socio-political matters i.e. civil liberty and equality, and economic realities / dynamics. One of the biggest feats of derailed communication during the administration's eight years occurred with the narrative of the economic “hole” the President inherited. We had a recession (which we occasionally do in our economic system as it is an accepted part of the economic cycle), in 2008 that most people didn’t realize was unnecessarily prolonged. The Obama administration capitalized (figuratively speaking only) on the confusion of the recession and used it as cover to institute huge un-trackable spending tirades and to institute a quasi-socialist form of government. By design, this would incumbent a huge new voting block of constituents dependent on government hand-outs. The recession was abrupt and severe, but its original cause directly contributed to only a couple years of lasting results. The Obama strategy was to exaggerate the impact of the 2008 credit crisis every time the issue of the economy arose during his presidency. The fact is, Obama's policies elongated the recession and failed to address another dynamic - a changing job market. Our industrial complex shrunk as part of a new industrial revolution and the jobs that were once prevalent quickly disappeared. This is in part due to NAFTA, which was instituted by Bill Clinton (as you will read further on) but also in part due to a technological evolution that Obama did not have the experience or foresight to recognize. We needed to re-tool, re-educate, re-direct our workforce to adjust and assimilate to the new economic environment. Obama’s answer was “shovel-ready jobs” which coincidentally never materialized. The business and service sector also lost millions of jobs as companies could longer afford to employ professionals in finance, customer service, and technical support, among many other professions. These professions were outsourced to other countries, increasing the U.S. unemployment rate.

If millennials failed to understand what happened over the previous eight years, then they certainly had no chance to recognize the economic causes behind the 2008 Financial Crisis. Historically, Bill Clinton originally set the wheels in motion for the 2008 Financial Crisis, otherwise known as the “housing bubble,” or “credit crisis.” The combination of two pieces of his legislation created the perfect storm for 2008: NAFTA, and The Community Reinvestment Act. A huge unemployed unqualified mortgage holding population in conjunction with a weak job market that lacked manufacturing jobs caused the credit market to surpass the Rubicon and finally implode in 2008. That’s not to say George W. Bush isn’t culpable for lacking the vision to see it coming, but let’s be clear about the causes and policies of origination.

B. Elitism The second area of media bias is a sort of bias towards self for those elitists who belong to the club. This includes media, government, special interest group, and foreign dignitary parties. The club is otherwise known as “The Establishment” and has all but avoided conviction for criminal activity, abuse of power, and corruption. At the epicenter of this group, the Clintons and their illegitimate power structure have perhaps prevailed as the most elusive. All corruption, criminal activity, and “the buck,” however, stop with the President of the United States, or so it should.

In addition to the issue of media bias, the social makeup of our youth population makes it difficult to conduct a discussion today of any value regarding virtue and leadership. Many lack credibility on the topic as they do not believe in anything with any kind of conviction or foundation. Yet they are quick to judge. Trump obviously did some things right with family as he raised three marvelous children and is trying to do a good thing in restoring the country. Why not give him a chance at redemption? All should analyze what they would receive in return.

What matters most are the core policy values that make us great, that make us the leaders of the world; i.e. economy, national and border security, Supreme Court integrity, protection of life and freedom. Well, jobs would be nice, and a whole plethora of other issues as you will see in reading further.

The truth is that substantive or truly issue based discussion no longer exists anywhere. This includes from TV analysts, politicians, colleges, and, especially, among family. Everyone is essentially dug in emotionally and committed to their own leanings. Open minds do not abound. Why? The answer is, capricious but deep emotional investment. Those in exception are those who truly stay connected with their convictions and with God (which is why we need God to remain in our founding framework).

We face a reality now where our government and the media deny terrorist activity exists, even during such events. They label it as “hate” or “home-grown.” Our policeman are murdered, our military is challenged by Iranian aggression, the superpowers of the world increasingly show the U.S. less respect, and our nation continues to divide and fragment.

The dynamic will not change and the country will remain unable to communicate about the issues unless those at the head of our power structures are removed. The potential of this country could be unlimited and its productivity unleashed. We would see examples of our true possibilities come to fruition, such as a booming economy, a renewal of the American auto industry, and the introduction of the hydrogen engine, just to name a few of the potential economical seeds of rebirth.

Hillary: The most compelling argument against Hillary is that she has created an environment that would inhibit her ability to effectively govern. The depth of corruption which she already spread virally via collusion throughout government, media, and special interest lobby groups prevents the possibility of a legitimate lawful government. She would govern outside the will of the people and would bolster political and special interest power.

1. She seeks power outside of the will of the people. The proof: 1. Her “deplorables,” view of anyone who disagrees with her elitist opinion 2. secret server: designed to shield her from conspiracy of corruption with her foundation, Benghazi, and her real political agenda and objectives 3. obstruction of justice, perjury to congress, 4. Bill Clinton secret meeting on airplane with AG to undermine criminal investigation, 5. intention to import vast numbers of illegal immigrants who will illegitimately add to her voting block (I would argue treason), 6. secret deal with Iran and other countries, 7. Wikileaks evidence; especially where she in her own words says that she has two different policies, one for the public and one in secret (she will not release Goldman Sachs and other special interest speeches)

2. Since her motes-operandum is to govern outside the will of the people, she by default has a lawless anti-democratic dictatorship view of government. “We the people” of course did not agree to a dictatorship. She and Obama have both technically committed crimes against the constitution because of their subversive actions while under oath to protect it. Many of Obama’s executive orders are unconstitutional per Supreme Court

3. Without the authority of the constitution, the lawlessness that we currently see will worsen. The targeting of police officers will increase, inner city violence will escalate, racial divides will deepen, and de-unification of the country will eventually lead to civil conflict. There would be a certain inevitability and immutability here with the diminished authority of the Constitution

4. Due to the “shady backroom deals” she has made and will continue to make, many parties will hold tremendous blackmail currency against her. These parties include Clinton Foundation donors, special interest groups, special access foreign dignitaries and leaders, the Justice Department, FBI, congress, the State Department, corporate media, and on and on. It only takes one incident where she allows them to influence her the wrong way to plunge us into a disaster. Those conditions (which she created) make it impossible for one not only to carry out the will of the people or lead, but to govern effectively at all.

Obama: 1. Obamacare. Clearly against will of people, “we have to pass the law before we can see what’s in it.” 2. RIT Terrorism. Left vacuum in Iraq creating ISIS. Allowed, allows ISIS to commit genocides while over-sympathizing with the larger Muslim (instead of placing some obligation on them to help) community and Iran. Placed these policies on FBI preventing them from doing their job with terrorist investigations (ex. San Bernardino, Orlando). 3. Racism & Unification. He not only did not do anything to reverse racism, he made it worse. With Treyvon Martin, and every other possible mixed race shooting, he took the opportunity to hurt instead of heal relations. He supports the racist Black Panther group. He gave the Justice department direction to intervene in high profile cases to insert pressure where they should not. Most recently his outward sympathetic lectures in response to the recent police murders further divided race relations and created more atmosphere for violence. 4. Allowed IRS scandal against conservative proprietors. 5. Abuse of Presidential power with executive orders. All presidents have used this power but not on highly inflammatory heated topics of disagreement. He blatantly obfuscated the will of the people and that of congress by breaking the current laws in place. The Supreme Court had to repel a couple of his attempts with his treatment of illegal immigrant entrance, and the Obamacare order vs. Catholic Church.

Top 10 List Trump over HRC / Obama

1. Supreme Court appointments and appointment to replace Justice Scalia. Priority: protection and support of Constitution and Constitution-based government

2. Jobs! Economy! Bad trade deals have led to outsource of millions of great American white and blue jobs. Need true executive to lead, one not tied to special interests or corruption. Jobs result in country, community, and family empowerment and unification

3. National Security; Anti-terror. Reverse secret Iran Deal, all foreign policy failures (too many to list). Reverse the reduction and "Wussification" (Col. Peters) of the military

4. Border Security; reverse drug infiltration, illegal immigrant crimes. Need Kate’s Law. Cultural and economic stability; reverse free welfare for illegals over Americans to help economic stability

5. Right to / Protection of life

6. Widespread HRC corruption and criminal activity; widespread government corruption. Benghazi crimes – before, during, and after the well-planned and known terror attack. IRS Scandal / crimes, Clinton Foundation crimes / fraud; profited via her Secretary of State job, Email crimes and perjury thereof

7. Obama and HRC anti-religious executive orders and posturing; “Cling to guns and religion…,” healthcare mandates, elimination of Pledge of Allegiance from schools, etc.

8. Energy policy, need independence and true innovation

9. Obamacare

10. Globalism ideology. “America last” ideology is not good for anyone. It weakens us and our leadership in the world. It also bleaches (“bleach-bits”) our culture. Globalization on the other hand is ok as it is just means international business collaboration where it makes sense like the space station, banking, credit cards, franchises, etc.

Bottom Line: America needs to feel empowered again especially at the community and family levels. We need to feel good about the American brand, our future, and our children’s future.

On Unification:

America's not racist we're just not family anymore. We have an extreme identity crisis both at the national, personal, and community levels. After we fix the jobs problem in America, we should all sit down and eat some apple pie together, maybe a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and a barbecue to boot. If we do not engage in a common heritage, we will break apart. This problem occurred because 1. We gave away our jobs and lost whole communities, 2. we capriciously grew too fast into many different directions in population and culture. This dynamic created Brexit in the UK. Immigration policy and population growth must make sense. Immigration is not just a word. First, it is a privilege. Roosevelt said something to the effect that anyone who comes must have something to offer and love America. Second, multiple fields of science determine the requirements, capacity for, and policy of, the rate and flow of immigrant population influx. Economic and social engineering, civil engineering and infrastructure, and census and population are all part of the study. We determine policy in consideration of what keeps us solvent in each of those aspects.

On Negative American Influence:

America has never acted imperialistically, however, I would argue that since the existence of the Internet and the international franchise, we have exercised a different form of imperialism. Our culture has permeated the entire globe for better and worse. Our businesses operate around the world, we spread sometimes the worst of our habits and values through these conduits. Our culture is in the hearts and minds of young people globally. In fact, in countries like Thailand and other Asian countries they are quite concerned that their culture has been eroded because of American infiltration with respect to business, culture, social interaction, and language. Furthermore, they have taken on growing health problems because of the diet changes that our franchises have introduced into their culture. Fast food has denigrated their eating habits and has led to a widespread Asian weight gain epidemic. You might say this is a form of globalization that needs to be improved upon.

On Job Market Changes:

We’ve had an industrial and job market renaissance over the last 10 years without anyone to lead us through it. The job market has changed mainly due to A. corporate outsourcing (which could have been avoided), and B. a global technological revolution, evident by Internet commerce, Apple, Samsung, Google, automation, and chip size, for example. Our workforce is still not prepared for that. We need a business executive and leader who can provide a vision for this as well as provide a fair international playing field.

On Political Correctness:

We have started to realize the trickle-down effect of the elite establishment trying to tell us all how to think. The term “political” has a bad sound and connotation to it and its meaning took a bad turn somewhere along the way. The root word “polite” by contrast is a nice word. It’s time for a back-to-the-basics approach to setting behavioral courtesy policy (what I call it). This is especially true if you plan to legislate it. That is by the way where we went wrong. Freedom of speech is exactly what it says. Without it we don’t get true dialogue or discussion of substance. Worse, when you remove God from culture it leads to the next level of breakdown, which is the loss of sense of values. That is completely counterproductive. Consequently, the next resulting loss is that of our freedoms. Take heed that when great civilizations lose their freedoms, they fall.

We are at the stage now where we have lost sight of social purpose and have confused and conflated the issues. A perfect example is the transgender issue. The power elites want to allow transgenders to go into either bathroom they wish in the name of civil rights. Well we know this is not relevant to rights but part of a political correctness agenda to curry favor with special interest groups. This divisive action is counterproductive in the attempt to resolve differences in our society because it blocks communication and hides from truth and natural discourse. It Doesn't allow critical thinking or even light discussion because it's governed by government, special interest, and media power elites and their standards. Communication blocks are otherwise known as censorship or infringement on free speech.